tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3702440740205408087.post4453258999238243749..comments2023-12-30T23:51:11.693+01:00Comments on Bluesmen's World(Music): Balogh Kálmán & The Gipsy Cimbalom Band: AromABluesmenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05352291416575623257noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3702440740205408087.post-28040901803691902762008-10-05T16:45:00.000+02:002008-10-05T16:45:00.000+02:00Love this kind of music, thanks a lot.I was positi...Love this kind of music, thanks a lot.<BR/>I was positively surpised by the trumpet player, great sound.<BR/>renrewAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3702440740205408087.post-91860692876232368792008-10-01T17:56:00.000+02:002008-10-01T17:56:00.000+02:00ok.. - i d/led the current one (one file at Rapid....ok.. - i d/led the current one (one file at Rapid.. - 74376 KB<BR/><BR/>and it's indeed at 192 kbps :)<BR/>thanks!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09513402870110686500noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3702440740205408087.post-41725421325274214522008-10-01T17:39:00.000+02:002008-10-01T17:39:00.000+02:00actually .. are you sure they are not both the sam...actually .. are you sure they are not both the same quality? (like both, say, at 128 or both at 192)?<BR/><BR/>Cuz .. this one's file size at Rapid.. is 74376 KB<BR/><BR/>and the previous one's file sizes at Rapid.. were: 35282 KB and 40000 KB (for a total of 75282 KB - which is like the same thing more or less .. or the previous one even 1000 kb bigger) :D<BR/><BR/>Let me know plz!<BR/><BR/>(and you can PM me at mp3.. (hungarian) forum .. or at ska.. forum and let me know why you don't indicate "kbps" in your posts here generally :)<BR/><BR/>cuz i noticed at ska.. - lately, when posting, you DO! ;-)Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09513402870110686500noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3702440740205408087.post-10445825955555694092008-10-01T17:32:00.000+02:002008-10-01T17:32:00.000+02:00ok.. - so now it's 192 then?then i will d/l :)by t...ok.. - so now it's 192 then?<BR/><BR/>then i will d/l :)<BR/><BR/>by the way.. i am NOT Igor...<BR/>and my gmail is at Darkman00@...<BR/><BR/>was just logged on to that email that would show "Igor" :)<BR/><BR/>That is why i let you know that i wasn't Igor (or his email) but Darkman :)Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09513402870110686500noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3702440740205408087.post-35710838788274132312008-10-01T13:37:00.000+02:002008-10-01T13:37:00.000+02:00Hi Igor (DarkmAn)!:)Sorry for the bad quality, I e...Hi Igor (DarkmAn)!:)<BR/>Sorry for the bad quality, I exchanged it for a better. This 192.kbps...<BR/>There is some reason for him, how I do not write it why the kbs, but we may talk about this in correspondence on himself possibly...<BR/>I do not put worse one up at 192 fundamentally (this current one was a chance).Bluesmenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05352291416575623257noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3702440740205408087.post-59327874380229230532008-10-01T10:41:00.000+02:002008-10-01T10:41:00.000+02:00it's me Darkman, Bluesmen :)I got this one in 128 ...it's me Darkman, Bluesmen :)<BR/><BR/>I got this one in 128 kbps..<BR/><BR/>Is this one also in 128 (so i wouldn't need to d/l it for nothing basically)...<BR/><BR/>Let me know plz<BR/><BR/>P.S.. - and for this reason only you should try to mention "kbps" for releases ( year would be nice too of course :) )<BR/><BR/>Cuz sometimes people alredy have the release.. - but by not knowing the quality, and hoping to improve the one that they have, they d/l the release, only to find out that it's the same thing...<BR/><BR/>etc :)Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09513402870110686500noreply@blogger.com